1. Inspector works in their own app
The third-party inspector or contractor uses whatever tool they already know — phone, tablet, paper-then-typed, or another fire door product. They produce their normal PDF report at the end of the visit.
Resources • migration • PDF import • review
A practical guide for migrating from PDF-based inspections: what Fire Door App can extract, what your team reviews, and when to use the "Send to support" path.
7‑day trial. No card required. Cancel anytime.
Last updated:
The import flow creates a draft inspection from your PDF - fast, but still reviewable before anything is saved. Three things to understand before you start.
Step 01
Upload a PDF and Fire Door App extracts property details, door list, inspection metadata, and component results into a draft inspection — ready to review before saving.
Step 02
Before saving, your team reviews five things: door IDs and locations, pass/fail outcomes, severity, findings and notes, and any duplicate records created from repeat visits.
Step 03
Scanned or image-only PDFs can't be parsed automatically. For unusual formats or when confidence is low, use "Send to support" for an assisted import — you still approve the draft before anything goes live.
Both routes end in the same place - stable door records, consistent outputs, and a register you can repeat visits against. The right path depends on what you're starting with.
Start from scratch
Clean setupImport PDFs
MigrationBest for
What happens
Outcome
Watch for
Imports are best-effort: Fire Door App extracts what it can, then your team reviews before saving. For scanned PDFs and unusual formats, use "Send to support" for an assisted import and review. Learn about the support path →
Migration playbook
A simple five-step plan for your first building
Pick one building
Import a single representative PDF from one building or small client site first. Don't start with a portfolio pack.
Agree door IDs and locations before scaling
Lock the ID format and location hierarchy before importing more buildings so the register doesn't drift between inspectors. Door ID checklist →
Review the draft
Check locations, pass/fail outcomes, severity, and notes. Fix what needs fixing, then create the inspection.
Run one end-to-end workflow
Use the imported inspection to generate an output and raise a small remedial set — so you know inspections, remedials, and client outputs all join up. How to use the app →
Only then scale
Import the rest of the estate using the same ID and location rules validated in steps 1–4. One building end-to-end catches most configuration drift before it multiplies.
The import creates a draft - not a finished record. Four categories of data get extracted when the PDF structure allows it, each requiring a review pass before anything is saved.
01 — Property & metadata
The first things extracted — used to create the inspection structure and tie the draft to the right property in your register.
Property details
Name and address where present — used as the starting structure for the inspection.
Where presentInspection metadata
Inspection date and inspector name where detectable in the PDF header or footer.
Where detectable02 — Doors & results
The core of the import — door records and inspection findings extracted from the body of the PDF when structure allows it.
Door list
Door locations and key attributes — ratings, dimensions, type fields — when detectable in a consistent table or list structure.
Structure-dependentComponent results
Pass/fail outcomes and notes where the PDF contains consistent component headings and result columns.
Consistency-dependentConfidence warnings
Low-confidence extractions are flagged in the draft — review these areas first before saving.
Review flagged areasWhy some PDFs are hard to parse
Three things that reduce extraction quality
Scanned PDFs — image-only reports don't contain extractable text. Fire Door App can't parse what it can't read. Use "Send to support" for these.
Inconsistent templates — if tables, headings, or row ordering change between pages, extraction confidence drops and more fields need manual correction.
Custom wording — fail reasons and component names vary between firms. Mapping may need manual correction during the review pass.
Prep checklist for best results
Five things to do before importing
Prefer text-based PDFs — exports from a reporting system are usually easier than scanned documents.
One PDF per building/visit — avoid large portfolio packs unless you plan to split them first.
Keep filenames meaningful — building name and date makes it easier to trace what you imported later.
Plan your door IDs — decide whether you'll keep existing IDs or reissue a clean scheme before importing at scale.
Expect a review pass — the import creates a draft, not a finished record. On-site QA still applies.
Three things to check on every draft inspection before creating it as a live record. Getting these right is what keeps the workflow joined up later - remedials, outputs, and repeat visits all depend on it.
The most important check. Location strings, floor labels, and ID references must be consistent — because these are what repeat visits use to open the same door record.
Verify outcomes for each opening so remedials can be prioritised and tracked accurately. Severity in particular drives triage — it needs to be in a field, not buried in a note.
Unclear or inconsistent notes make outputs look unprofessional and make it hard to compare findings across buildings and visits. A quick edit pass now prevents long-term reporting drift.
Common fixes during review
Four things teams typically correct before saving
Make floor labels and area names consistent across all doors in the draft — "Floor 02" not "2nd floor", "Stair A" not "stairwell A" or "stairs". Use your agreed glossary as the reference. This is the most common source of reporting drift.
Move "urgent", "immediate", or priority language out of notes and into the severity field. Severity drives remedial filtering — if it's buried in a note, it won't surface in triage views or exports. Use a consistent set: High / Medium / Low.
Pick a consistent wording set for common fail reasons and apply it across all doors in the draft. "Closer inoperative" not "broken closer", "closer not working", and "Closer-faulty" — three different strings for the same finding make cross-building reports impossible to compare.
If the same physical door appears twice in the draft — often from inconsistent location naming across pages — merge the intent before saving. Duplicates that become live records create two separate histories for one door and break remedial tracking. Much cheaper to fix in the draft than after saving.
The support path is for teams migrating large estates where getting to a consistent door register fast matters more than perfect extraction on day one. You still approve the draft - nothing goes live without your sign-off.
Support import flow
Step 01 — Done
Upload your PDF and choose "Send to support" from the import flow. Include the context support needs to scope and price the work accurately.
Step 02 — Active
Support reviews the PDF and confirms what can be extracted and the expected time and quality before proceeding. You decide whether to go ahead before any work starts.
Step 03 — Next
You receive the draft inspection and review it — door identities, outcomes, severity, notes — exactly as you would for a standard import. Nothing becomes live data until you approve it.
What to include when you send to support
Four things that help scope the import accurately
Which building or site
And whether this is a first import or an update to an existing record.
What you need out of it
Door list only, full findings, or a specific reporting outcome — be explicit so support doesn't over or under-extract.
Your existing ID scheme
Whether you want to keep existing door IDs from the PDF or reissue a clean scheme on import.
How many PDFs and their format
Count and typical size — scanned vs exported — so support can estimate time and quality before the quote.
This path is designed for teams migrating large estates where getting to a consistent door register fast matters more than perfect extraction on day one. You review the draft and approve it before anything becomes live data.
Scenario
Managing agents and FM teams who keep Fire Door App as the master record do not need their contractors to switch tools. The PDF import path lets the inspection happen anywhere and still land in one consolidated record.
The third-party inspector or contractor uses whatever tool they already know — phone, tablet, paper-then-typed, or another fire door product. They produce their normal PDF report at the end of the visit.
The inspector emails the PDF over (or uploads it to a shared folder). The managing agent or FM lead drops it into Import PDF in their workspace — same flow as a migration import, no template setup needed for common layouts.
Property, doors, components, pass/fail and notes prefilled with confidence scores. Nothing is saved until the managing agent reviews and commits — at which point it joins every other inspection under the same building, the same portfolio view, the same audit trail.
Reports from multiple contractors and inspectors consolidate into one history per door. Remedials, exports, client portal sharing and CSV/PDF reporting all run from the consolidated record — not from a folder of PDFs.
Four questions that come up when teams start migrating from PDF-based inspections. Deeper edge cases are in the related guides.
No — and they're not designed to. Imports create a draft so your team can migrate faster, but someone still reviews identity, outcomes, severity, and notes before anything is saved. The review is the QA pass.
Imports are best-effort extraction from a document. On-site inspection captures first-hand evidence — photos, measurements, assessments — that a PDF can only partially represent. The two complement each other; one doesn't replace the other.
Text-based exports from a reporting system import most cleanly — consistent headings, structured tables, predictable component ordering. These give Fire Door App the most to work with during extraction.
Scanned or image-only PDFs don't contain extractable text, so the automatic path won't work. Use "Send to support" for these — support can review the document and quote for an assisted import. One PDF per building works better than large portfolio packs.
Door IDs & support
You can keep existing IDs if they're unique and stable. Carrying them over avoids a remapping exercise and keeps continuity with any prior records your client holds. Confirm them during the review pass — the draft will surface any it couldn't confidently match.
If existing IDs drift, clash, or are tied to locations that might change, it's better to reissue a clean scheme and document the mapping from old to new before importing at scale. Decide the rule early and apply it consistently across the estate.
For scanned, image-only, or unusually structured PDFs where automatic extraction won't work or would produce too many errors to correct manually. You upload the PDF and choose "Send to support" from the import flow.
Support reviews the document, confirms what can be extracted and at what quality, and provides a quote before any work starts. You approve the scope, then receive a draft inspection to review — the same review pass as a standard import. Nothing becomes live data without your approval.
Quick facts
PDF import at a glance
Import creates
A draft — nothing saved until you review and confirm
Best PDF type
Text-based export with consistent structure
Scanned PDFs
Use "Send to support" — can't auto-extract image-only
Existing door IDs
Keep if unique + stable; reissue if they drift or clash
Imports replace
Retyping — not on-site QA or first-hand evidence
Support path approval
You approve scope before work starts + draft before go-live
Get started
Import a PDF, review a draft inspection, then follow the workflow into remedials and client outputs.
Four checklists that work alongside the import process - covering the ID system you set before importing, the evidence standard you're migrating toward, and how to connect tags once IDs are stable.
Door IDs
How to choose a stable door ID and location hierarchy so repeat visits stay consistent. Set this up before importing at scale.
Standards
A checklist for keeping inspection evidence consistent across inspectors, visits, and buildings — the standard the imported records are being migrated toward.
QR tagging
Rollout checklist for QR tags, scan logs, and access control for shared links. Apply tags after IDs are stable — not before.
Reference
Definitions for door registers, audit trails, BS 8214 record-keeping, and remedials severity. The agreed terminology to use consistently across the team during migration.
Import a PDF, review a draft inspection, then follow the workflow into remedials and client outputs.
We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site, and optional analytics to understand how it’s used. You decide.
Sign-in, security, and remembering your cookie choice. Required.
Anonymised usage stats via Google Analytics 4. Off by default.
Before you go…
Browse real PDF reports, CSV exports and audit-trail samples — the kind your team would produce after one inspection.
No card required · Cancel anytime