Skip to content
Two modules, one subscription EU hosted Built inside a working fire door company
Fire stopping · evidence

A fire stopping record that survives a handover.

Compartmentation evidence goes stale faster than door evidence, because a penetration is easy to lose and easy to re-open. The minimum record per item, and how to keep it defensible.

3 min read FM & estatesContractorsHousing
Fire stopping survey report, page one
FIG. 01  Fire stopping survey report, page one

Section 01How to do it

  1. 01

    Give every penetration an identity

    An ID, a location and a position on the floorplan. Without this the rest is a photo album.

  2. 02

    Photograph as found

    On a survey, an as-found photograph. On an installation or a re-seal, before, during and after — because the middle one is what proves the detail behind the finished face.

  3. 03

    Reference the tested system

    What it was installed to, not what it looks like. This is the difference between a record and an opinion.

  4. 04

    Record rating achieved against rating required

    A shortfall stated on the record is a manageable problem. A shortfall in somebody’s head is not.

  5. 05

    Keep certificates and their expiry visible

    Expiry warnings surface before they lapse, so renewal is planned rather than discovered on site.

  6. 06

    Hand over the whole thing, not a summary

    Survey report, per-penetration reports and the register CSV. A summary is not evidence.

Section 02What the app actually does here

  • Every penetration carries its supporting element, substrate, services, opening size, annular gap and seal depth
  • The tested system used is recorded against the seal, with its certification body and reference
  • A survey records as-found photographs; an installation records before, during and after
  • No access is a recorded outcome with a mandatory reason, never a silent pass
  • The tested-systems appendix carries the certification reference for every system used in the report
  • Certificate expiry dates are held per system, and warn you before they lapse
  • The whole register exports as CSV, one row per penetration

Section 03What goes wrong

Every one of these has cost somebody real time. They are cheap to avoid and expensive to unwind.

One photo of a finished face

It proves the face. It proves nothing about what is behind it.

Recording the product but not the system

A tested system is a specification, not a tube of sealant.

Letting a re-opened penetration keep its old record

If somebody has been back through it, that is a new state and needs new evidence.

Section 04Questions

Q01

What is the minimum record per penetration?

Identity, location, photographs, the tested system referenced, and the rating achieved against the rating required. Anything less is not defensible.
Q02

Do we need before-and-after photos on a survey?

A survey records as-found. Before, during and after apply when you install or re-seal — the during shot is the one that matters.
Q03

How is this different from the fire door side?

Same principles, its own workspace, its own register and its own reports. Note the spelling difference: fire stopping uses RAMs, fire doors use RAMS.

Section 05Related

Start today

Guides help. Doing it helps more.

Everything above is checkable inside the trial, on a real building, with nothing held back and no card required.

7-day trial · No card · Cancel anytime